Pileru
Winner — 2009
A clear win with a 6.1% margin.
1 of 11 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.08 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
11 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NALLARI KIRAN KUMAR REDDY | INC (UPA) | 53,905 | 35.8% |
| 2 | IMTIYAZ AHMED SHAIK | TDP | 44,773 | 29.7% |
| 3 | CHINTALA RAMACHANDRA REDDY | PRAP | 44,197 | 29.3% |
| 4 | KOTAPALLI SANONDRA REDDY | NDA | 2,170 | 1.4% |
| 5 | BONUMALLA VENKATESU | IND | 1,783 | 1.2% |
| 6 | BALUM SESHADRI YADAV | BSP | 1,171 | 0.8% |
| 7 | NEERUGATTI VENKATRAMANA | BHSASP | 629 | 0.4% |
| 8 | KAVALI VENUGOPAL NAYUNIVARU | LSP | 598 | 0.4% |
| 9 | GADDAM YESURAJU | ANC | 592 | 0.4% |
| 10 | ASADI VENKATADRI | RKSP | 518 | 0.3% |
| 11 | S.S.PRASAD | IND | 438 | 0.3% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Average turnout (109th), a typical margin, an essentially two-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.08 Cr
A moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
4 locationsLower fort, centre fort wall, moat, old gate-way, old hanuman temple, old mandapam and old mosque
Lower fort, centre fort wall, moat, old gate-way, old hanuman temple, old mandapam and old mosque
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.