Back to Bihar 1990 map
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 205 · 1990
Masaurhi
Winner — 1990
YOUGESHWAR GOP
IPF
IPF 22.7%INC 22.0%28 others 55.3%
Votes
31,142
22.7% share
Winning margin
966
0.7% of votes
Total candidates
30
Turnout
67.8%
of 2,02,650
Masaurhi was decided by a razor-thin margin of 0.7% — fewer than 966 votes separated winner from runner-up.
Seat history
All Candidates
30 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | YOUGESHWAR GOP | IPF | 31,142 | 22.7% |
| 2 | POONAM DEVI | INC | 30,176 | 22.0% |
| 3 | DHARMENDER PRASAD | IND | 28,672 | 20.9% |
| 4 | LAKHAN DEV PRASAD | IND | 19,696 | 14.3% |
| 5 | DHARMENDER PRASAD SINGH | National Front | 9,758 | 7.1% |
| 6 | HARI SHANKAR SHARMA | Left | 3,841 | 2.8% |
| 7 | ARUN KUMAR YADAV | BJP | 3,489 | 2.5% |
| 8 | SUSHIL KUMAR | IND | 2,848 | 2.1% |
| 9 | SURYADAV SINGH | IND | 1,659 | 1.2% |
| 10 | ARJUN RAM | IND | 1,318 | 1.0% |
| 11 | MUNDRIKA CHOUDHARY | IND | 763 | 0.6% |
| 12 | MOTI LAL PRASAD | IND | 740 | 0.5% |
| 13 | RAM NATH TIWARI | IND | 572 | 0.4% |
| 14 | CHANDER KET SINGH | IND | 456 | 0.3% |
| 15 | SHYAM NARAIN PRASAD SINGH | IND | 443 | 0.3% |
| 16 | JAI RAM SHARMA | 380 | 0.3% | |
| 17 | AMAR NATH GOSWAMI | IND | 360 | 0.3% |
| 18 | MOHD. ZAFAR | IND | 157 | 0.1% |
| 19 | RAM NARESH SINGH | IND | 131 | 0.1% |
| 20 | BABU NAND SINGH | IND | 102 | 0.1% |
| 21 | DEV NARAIN DAS | IND | 96 | 0.1% |
| 22 | RAM VARAN PRASAD | IND | 79 | 0.1% |
| 23 | RAM LAKHAN YADAV | IND | 77 | 0.1% |
| 24 | LAL BABU PRASAD | LKD(B) | 69 | 0.1% |
| 25 | RAM NANDAN SINGH | IND | 64 | 0.1% |
| 26 | DEV NATH SINGH | IND | 56 | 0.0% |
| 27 | RAM JATAN PRASAD | IND | 55 | 0.0% |
| 28 | RAM SHOBHIT SINGH | IND | 52 | 0.0% |
| 29 | ASHOK KUMAR | IND | 44 | 0.0% |
| 30 | AKHILESHWAR SINGH | IND | 30 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (110th), a typical margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean0.7%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 11.9% · min 0.4% · max 46.2%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
69%
lowerhigher
110th of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.33
fewer partiesmore parties
20th of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
1.0%
lowerhigher
214th of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.33EFFECTIVE PARTIES
IPF 22.7%INC 22.0%IND 20.9%IND 14.3%JD 7.1%OTH 13.0%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
16,26,384
Density
488 / km²
Sex ratio
920 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
3,332 km²
SC population22.7%
ST population3.6%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
90%HINDU
Hindu 89.5%Muslim 9.6%Other 0.9%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water3.7%
Electricity21.6%
Sanitation16.7%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births83.3%
Children fully vaccinated88.9%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER44.1%
Children underweight (under 5)47.2%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER70.3%
Women literate66.0%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER27.1%
Clean cooking fuel29.0%
Health insurance18.1%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Carpet🏺Rice
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.