Back to Bihar 1990 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 23 · 1990
Mirganj
Winner — 1990
PRABHU DAYAL SINGH
IND
IND 21.2%CPM 20.1%28 others 58.7%
Votes
22,332
21.2% share
Winning margin
1,231
1.2% of votes
Total candidates
30
Turnout
69.3%
of 1,51,718
Mirganj was decided by a razor-thin margin of 1.2% — fewer than 1,231 votes separated winner from runner-up.
Seat history
All Candidates
30 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRABHU DAYAL SINGH | IND | 22,332 | 21.2% |
| 2 | VISHAVNATH SINGH | Left | 21,101 | 20.1% |
| 3 | KANHIYA SAWROOP PATHAK | National Front | 18,342 | 17.4% |
| 4 | RANDHIR KUMAR SINGH | INC | 12,402 | 11.8% |
| 5 | BALI RAM SINGH | IND | 12,024 | 11.4% |
| 6 | MOHD. ISLAM | UCPI | 5,005 | 4.8% |
| 7 | BALESHWAR PRASAD | 3,086 | 2.9% | |
| 8 | TAPSI DIXIT | IND | 2,759 | 2.6% |
| 9 | MOHAN PRASAD | LKD(B) | 1,972 | 1.9% |
| 10 | JAI RAM CHUDHARY | IND | 1,550 | 1.5% |
| 11 | SARIF SAH | IND | 1,518 | 1.4% |
| 12 | RAMAGYA SINGH | IND | 556 | 0.5% |
| 13 | FULENA MAHTO | IND | 492 | 0.5% |
| 14 | JAWAHIR PRASAD | IND | 365 | 0.3% |
| 15 | JIKRULAGH | IND | 277 | 0.3% |
| 16 | TIRATH RAJ SINGH | 202 | 0.2% | |
| 17 | KUBER NATH PATHAK | IND | 185 | 0.2% |
| 18 | RAM CHANDER PRASAD YADAV | IND | 181 | 0.2% |
| 19 | AMUL SINGH | IND | 157 | 0.1% |
| 20 | ASHOK SINGH | IND | 134 | 0.1% |
| 21 | RAM NARESH SINGH | IND | 125 | 0.1% |
| 22 | JANAK SING | IND | 99 | 0.1% |
| 23 | MUSTAK ALI | IND | 88 | 0.1% |
| 24 | ANIRUDH PRASAD | IND | 53 | 0.1% |
| 25 | HARE RAM CHAUDHARY | IND | 50 | 0.1% |
| 26 | DHRUVJI PRASAD | IND | 44 | 0.0% |
| 27 | RAM KRISHAN THAKUR | IND | 38 | 0.0% |
| 28 | SHRI KRISHAN DEV SINGH | IND | 34 | 0.0% |
| 29 | RAM NARESH CHUDHARY | IND | 20 | 0.0% |
| 30 | PARDEEP KUMAR | IND | 18 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (115th), a comfortable margin, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe1.2%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 19.0% · min 0.3% · max 67.8%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
68%
lowerhigher
115th of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.25
fewer partiesmore parties
229th of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
1.3%
lowerhigher
175th of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.25EFFECTIVE PARTIES
IND 21.2%CPM 20.1%JD 17.4%INC 11.8%IND 11.4%OTH 18.1%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
34,23,574
Density
1492 / km²
Sex ratio
899 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
2,294 km²
SC population11.8%
ST population0.1%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
78%HINDU
Hindu 78.1%Muslim 21.6%Other 0.3%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water1.5%
Electricity9.0%
Sanitation20.8%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births64.4%
Children fully vaccinated66.6%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER54.2%
Children underweight (under 5)40.8%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER61.7%
Women literate51.7%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER46.8%
Clean cooking fuel40.5%
Health insurance20.7%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Applique Work🏷️LitchiGI🏺Sikki Art
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.