Back to Bihar 1995 map
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 214 · 1995
Sandesh
Winner — 1995
RAMESHWAR PRASAD
CPI(ML)(L)
CPI(ML)(L) 34.2%IND 19.6%29 others 46.2%
Votes
36,760
34.2% share
Winning margin
15,737
14.7% of votes
Total candidates
31
Turnout
66.5%
of 1,61,530
A clear win with a 14.7% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
31 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESHWAR PRASAD | CPI(ML)(L) | 36,760 | 34.2% |
| 2 | SIDHNATH ROY | IND | 21,023 | 19.6% |
| 3 | SONADHARI SINGH | Janata Dal | 16,741 | 15.6% |
| 4 | BIJENDRA KUMAR SINGH | IND | 15,957 | 14.9% |
| 5 | BIJENDRA SINGH | BPP | 6,189 | 5.8% |
| 6 | JITENDRA SINGH | BJP | 1,838 | 1.7% |
| 7 | KAMLA KANT SHARMA | INC | 1,060 | 1.0% |
| 8 | RAM ASHISH GUPTA | IND | 1,040 | 1.0% |
| 9 | PRADIP KUMAR SINGH | BADP | 1,016 | 0.9% |
| 10 | RAM SAKAL SINGH | Samajwadi Party | 646 | 0.6% |
| 11 | KAMLESH NARAIN SINGH | JP | 639 | 0.6% |
| 12 | PRABHU RAM SINGH | IND | 608 | 0.6% |
| 13 | PRABHU SINGH | IND | 549 | 0.5% |
| 14 | RAMJEE DUBEY | IND | 361 | 0.3% |
| 15 | RAMESHWAR ROY | 361 | 0.3% | |
| 16 | MAHENDRA MAHTO | IND | 328 | 0.3% |
| 17 | CHANDRAMA SINGH | IND | 309 | 0.3% |
| 18 | SATYENDRA SINGH | IND | 306 | 0.3% |
| 19 | AWADHESH SINGH | IND | 284 | 0.3% |
| 20 | JAI RAM PANDIT | IND | 232 | 0.2% |
| 21 | RAM GHAN SINGH | IND | 198 | 0.2% |
| 22 | TARKESHWAR RAM | IND | 143 | 0.1% |
| 23 | DINESH SINGH | IND | 108 | 0.1% |
| 24 | CHANDRA BHUSHAN SINGH | IND | 108 | 0.1% |
| 25 | SANJAY KUMAR SINGH | IND | 99 | 0.1% |
| 26 | RAM AWATAR SINGH | IND | 97 | 0.1% |
| 27 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH | IND | 91 | 0.1% |
| 28 | AKHILESH SINGH | IND | 81 | 0.1% |
| 29 | SHEOJEE SINGH | IND | 76 | 0.1% |
| 30 | DR. RAJENDRA SHARMA | IND | 72 | 0.1% |
| 31 | KRISHNA NANDAN CHAUDHARY | IND | 71 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (181st), a typical margin, a two-to-three-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean14.7%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 14.1% · min 4.4% · max 35.7%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
64%
lowerhigher
181st of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.72
fewer partiesmore parties
83rd of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.8%
lowerhigher
228th of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.72EFFECTIVE PARTIES
CPI(ML)(L) 34.2%IND 19.6%JD 15.6%IND 14.9%BPP 5.8%OTH 10.0%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
7,00,843
Density
1099 / km²
Sex ratio
928 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
638 km²
SC population20.2%
ST population0.1%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
90%HINDU
Hindu 90.5%Muslim 9.2%Other 0.4%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water1.4%
Electricity1.9%
Sanitation23.7%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births79.2%
Children fully vaccinated84.2%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER45.6%
Children underweight (under 5)52.9%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER66.9%
Women literate62.5%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER37.5%
Clean cooking fuel29.3%
Health insurance15.6%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Mushroom🏺Pumpkin
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.