Back to Bihar 1995 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 230 · 1995
Bhabhua
Winner — 1995
RAM LAL SINGH
CPI· Left
CPI 40.3%IND 14.0%30 others 45.7%
Votes
51,744
40.3% share
Winning margin
33,838
26.4% of votes
Total candidates
32
Turnout
63.5%
of 2,01,919
Bhabhua is a safe seat — RAM LAL SINGH won by 26.4%.
Seat history
All Candidates
32 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAM LAL SINGH | Left | 51,744 | 40.3% |
| 2 | VIJAY SHANKAR PANDEY | IND | 17,906 | 14.0% |
| 3 | RAM SINGHSHAN UPADHYAY | INC | 15,631 | 12.2% |
| 4 | RAN VIJAY BAHADUR SINGH | 10,321 | 8.1% | |
| 5 | ASHOK SINGH | 9,716 | 7.6% | |
| 6 | RAJ LALLAN SINGH | IND | 9,574 | 7.5% |
| 7 | HARIDWAR TIWARI | BJP | 1,679 | 1.3% |
| 8 | SHIV PUJAN BIND | IND | 1,466 | 1.1% |
| 9 | RAM NATH SINGH | IND | 1,131 | 0.9% |
| 10 | MUMTAJ ANSARI | BPP | 1,051 | 0.8% |
| 11 | ALLAUDDIN ANSARI | IND | 996 | 0.8% |
| 12 | KISHORI RAM | IND | 825 | 0.6% |
| 13 | GUPTESHWAR PRASAD | IND | 769 | 0.6% |
| 14 | GAURI SHANKER PASWAN | JP | 646 | 0.5% |
| 15 | SAGAR RAM | IND | 587 | 0.5% |
| 16 | YAMUNA SHUKLA | IND | 509 | 0.4% |
| 17 | CHANDRAJEET SINGH | IND | 458 | 0.4% |
| 18 | HASHIM KHAN | IND | 437 | 0.3% |
| 19 | RAVINDRA KUMAR PASWAN | IND | 378 | 0.3% |
| 20 | DADHIBAL SINGH | BKUS | 324 | 0.3% |
| 21 | NIRMALA DEVI | IND | 307 | 0.2% |
| 22 | RAGHUWAR PASWAN | IND | 291 | 0.2% |
| 23 | VIJAY BAHADUR SINGH | IND | 216 | 0.2% |
| 24 | BISHAMBER PANDEY | IND | 214 | 0.2% |
| 25 | VIJAY KUMAR PANDEY | IND | 211 | 0.2% |
| 26 | RAMKESHI PRASAD | IND | 149 | 0.1% |
| 27 | RAJENDRA SINGH | IND | 149 | 0.1% |
| 28 | SATYA NARAYAN PRASAD | IND | 148 | 0.1% |
| 29 | NAND KISHOR SHAH GUPTA | IND | 130 | 0.1% |
| 30 | VIJAY KUMAR | CPI(ML)(L) | 106 | 0.1% |
| 31 | KAILASH TIWARI | IND | 105 | 0.1% |
| 32 | MD. HANIF RAIN | IND | 102 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (221st), a comfortable margin, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean26.4%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 13.1% · min 0.4% · max 33.4%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
60%
lowerhigher
221st of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.24
fewer partiesmore parties
231st of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.4%
lowerhigher
241st of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.24EFFECTIVE PARTIES
CPI 40.3%IND 14.0%INC 12.2%SAP 8.1%BSP 7.6%IND 7.5%OTH 10.4%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
43,91,418
Density
883 / km²
Sex ratio
938 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
4,976 km²
SC population30.4%
ST population0.1%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
88%HINDU
Hindu 88.3%Muslim 11.1%Other 0.6%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water5.3%
Electricity16.3%
Sanitation24.2%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births76.6%
Children fully vaccinated85.0%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER47.4%
Children underweight (under 5)43.5%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER64.3%
Women literate59.4%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER42.8%
Clean cooking fuel34.7%
Health insurance9.7%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Handloom/Garments🏺Stone Art🏺Tilkut
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.