Back to Bihar 1995 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Bihar · Assembly Constituency 238 · 1995
Aurangabad
Winner — 1995
RAMADHAR SINGH
BJP· BJP
BJP 23.9%CPI 20.3%31 others 55.8%
Votes
25,640
23.9% share
Winning margin
3,853
3.6% of votes
Total candidates
33
Turnout
54.0%
of 1,98,966
A closely fought contest. RAMADHAR SINGH won with a 3.6% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
33 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMADHAR SINGH | BJP | 25,640 | 23.9% |
| 2 | TRIBHUVAN SINGH | Left | 21,787 | 20.3% |
| 3 | JITENDRA YADAV | IND | 11,922 | 11.1% |
| 4 | JAMUNA SINGH | IND | 9,993 | 9.3% |
| 5 | SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH | 9,690 | 9.0% | |
| 6 | BRAJ MOHAN SINGH | INC | 8,631 | 8.0% |
| 7 | MD. KUDUS ANSARI | 6,669 | 6.2% | |
| 8 | RAM KRIPAL SINGH | BPP | 4,696 | 4.4% |
| 9 | LALDEO VISHWAKARMA | IND | 1,146 | 1.1% |
| 10 | DR. GUPTESHWAR SINGH | Samajwadi Party | 1,137 | 1.1% |
| 11 | MD. FARUK | CPI(ML)(L) | 839 | 0.8% |
| 12 | RANJAN KUMAR SINGH | IND | 626 | 0.6% |
| 13 | VISHWANATH PRASAD | IND | 563 | 0.5% |
| 14 | RAJ KUMAR SINGH | IND | 545 | 0.5% |
| 15 | BASANT YADAV | IND | 525 | 0.5% |
| 16 | SURENDAR MOHAN | IND | 369 | 0.3% |
| 17 | SURENDRA KUMAR SINGH | 301 | 0.3% | |
| 18 | DHIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH | IND | 242 | 0.2% |
| 19 | SREE KANT SINGH | IND | 236 | 0.2% |
| 20 | SUNIL KUMAR | IND | 229 | 0.2% |
| 21 | SATYENDRA SINGH | IND | 207 | 0.2% |
| 22 | RAMJI SINGH | 170 | 0.2% | |
| 23 | SANJAY SRIWASTAWA | IND | 170 | 0.2% |
| 24 | DHARMENDRA KUMAR | IND | 170 | 0.2% |
| 25 | BIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH | IND | 150 | 0.1% |
| 26 | UPENDRA NATH THAKUR | IND | 111 | 0.1% |
| 27 | ARJUN PRASAD SINGH | IND | 109 | 0.1% |
| 28 | NAGINA SINGH | BKUS | 108 | 0.1% |
| 29 | SAHDEO YADAV | IND | 105 | 0.1% |
| 30 | SATYENDRA NARAYAN SINGH | 89 | 0.1% | |
| 31 | RAMNARESH SINGH | IND | 73 | 0.1% |
| 32 | RAM PRAKASH PRASAD VERMA | IND | 71 | 0.1% |
| 33 | DHARMENDRA SINGH | IND | 69 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (233rd), a typical margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean3.6%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 9.8% · min 1.4% · max 33.4%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
57%
lowerhigher
233rd of 243How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.49
fewer partiesmore parties
13th of 243How much NOTA?
SEAT
2.4%
lowerhigher
46th of 243Where does the house stand?
SEAT
324 seats · 163 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.49EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BJP 23.9%CPI 20.3%IND 11.1%IND 9.3%SAP 9.0%INC 8.0%OTH 18.4%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
22,19,146
Density
890 / km²
Sex ratio
939 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
2,494 km²
SC population25.5%
ST population0.1%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
89%HINDU
Hindu 88.5%Muslim 11.0%Other 0.5%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water2.9%
Electricity9.0%
Sanitation22.3%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births79.9%
Children fully vaccinated74.5%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER49.4%
Children underweight (under 5)37.3%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER70.4%
Women literate62.1%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER43.3%
Clean cooking fuel40.7%
Health insurance8.1%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Handloom🏺Magahi Paan/ Betel Vine
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.