Nalanda
Winner — 2015
Nalanda was decided by a razor-thin margin of 1.9% — fewer than 2,996 votes separated winner from runner-up.
5 of 13 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹1.07 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
14 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHRAWON KUMAR | Mahagathbandhan (Bihar) | 72,596 | 44.8% |
| 2 | KAUSHLENDRA KUMAR | NDA | 69,600 | 42.9% |
| — | NOTA | NOTA | 6,531 | 4.0% |
| 4 | ARUNESH KUMAR YADAV | IND | 3,558 | 2.2% |
| 5 | SANJAY KUMAR | IND | 1,678 | 1.0% |
| 6 | DILIP KUMAR | BSP | 1,583 | 1.0% |
| 7 | JIBINDRA KUMAR PANDEY ALIAS- SHIVENDRA KUMAR | 1,405 | 0.9% | |
| 8 | MANMOHAN KUMAR | CPI(ML)(L) CPI(ML)(L) | 1,145 | 0.7% |
| 9 | DILEEP CHAUDHARY | JAPL | 1,124 | 0.7% |
| 10 | SURENDRA KUMAR | BIP | 1,068 | 0.7% |
| 11 | SHYAMPATI DEVI | MANJP | 601 | 0.4% |
| 12 | VINOD UGANWI | RAIP | 476 | 0.3% |
| 13 | DEO KUMAR | 376 | 0.2% | |
| 14 | PARTIMA DEVI | RSADP | 376 | 0.2% |
.png){kind=small}
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Low turnout (204th), a comfortable margin, a two-to-three-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹1.07 Cr
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
6 locations
All mounds, structures and buildings enclosed in the acquired area (Excavated remains)
All mounds, structures and buildings enclosed in the acquired area (Excavated remains)
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.