Winner — 2005
Manoharpur was decided by a razor-thin margin of 1.8% — fewer than 1,597 votes separated winner from runner-up.
All Candidates
12 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JOBA MAJHI | UGDP UGDP | 26,810 | 30.7% |
| 2 | GURU CHARAN NAYAK | NDA | 25,213 | 28.9% |
| 3 | SUKHDEV HEMBROM | UPA | 15,173 | 17.4% |
| 4 | SUGYANI KODAH | 7,787 | 8.9% | |
| 5 | HARDUGAN MANKI | IND | 3,947 | 4.5% |
| 6 | SANGI MURMU | JVD | 1,688 | 1.9% |
| 7 | JAIPAL SINGH PURTY | UPA | 1,617 | 1.9% |
| 8 | JESSE KALUNDIA | JKP | 1,414 | 1.6% |
| 9 | SALEM SUGAR BHUINYA | BSP | 1,175 | 1.3% |
| 10 | LEONARD BODRA | IND | 871 | 1.0% |
| 11 | NANDLAL BODRA | IND | 858 | 1.0% |
| 12 | ALBINA TOPNO | IND | 833 | 0.9% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Low turnout (65th), a comfortable margin, a two-to-three-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
A moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.