Back to Madhya Pradesh 1980 map
Madhya Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 64 · 1980
Rampur Baghelan
Winner — 1980
HARSH SINGH
INC(I)· Congress (I)
INC(I) 31.0%JNP(SC) 28.9%8 others 40.1%
Votes
14,452
31.0% share
Winning margin
943
2.0% of votes
Total candidates
10
Turnout
55.3%
of 84,434
A closely fought contest. HARSH SINGH won with a 2.0% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
10 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HARSH SINGH | Congress (I) | 14,452 | 31.0% |
| 2 | TOSHAN SINGH | JNP(SC) | 13,509 | 28.9% |
| 3 | KESHAV PRASAD TEWARI | BJP | 8,627 | 18.5% |
| 4 | PARBHAKAR SINGH | JNP(JP) | 5,171 | 11.1% |
| 5 | GIRIJA PRASAD | 1,312 | 2.8% | |
| 6 | BALMIK SINGH | IND | 1,128 | 2.4% |
| 7 | SATYANARAYAN MISHRA | IND | 643 | 1.4% |
| 8 | JAGDAMBA PRASAD | IND | 639 | 1.4% |
| 9 | VISHRAM DAS | JNP(SR) | 635 | 1.4% |
| 10 | ASHOK KUMAR | IND | 558 | 1.2% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (148th), a typical margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean2.0%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 14.3% · min 0.7% · max 50.8%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
77%
lowerhigher
148th of 230How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.23
fewer partiesmore parties
13th of 230How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.9%
lowerhigher
108th of 230Where does the house stand?
SEAT
320 seats · 161 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.23EFFECTIVE PARTIES
INC(I) 31.0%JNP(SC) 28.9%BJP 18.5%JNP(JP) 11.1%OTH 10.5%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
22,28,935
Density
297 / km²
Sex ratio
926 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
7,502 km²
SC population17.9%
ST population14.4%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
97%HINDU
Hindu 96.8%Other 3.2%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water10.7%
Electricity61.6%
Sanitation29.8%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births85.5%
Children fully vaccinated76.3%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER49.4%
Children underweight (under 5)31.2%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER57.3%
Women literate69.1%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER12.9%
Clean cooking fuel35.2%
Health insurance22.0%
What's nearby?
2 locationsSEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Tomato
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.
