Seohara
Winner — 1991
Seohara is a safe seat — MAHABEER SINGH won by 17.2%.
All Candidates
14 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MAHABEER SINGH | BJP | 51,412 | 44.7% |
| 2 | ANWAR | Janata Dal | 31,674 | 27.5% |
| 3 | ASHOK KUMAR | JP | 9,671 | 8.4% |
| 4 | JAI SINGH | IND | 7,634 | 6.6% |
| 5 | YESHPAL SINGH | INC | 6,995 | 6.1% |
| 6 | SHAMEEM AHMAD | 4,993 | 4.3% | |
| 7 | SURENDRA SINGH | IND | 583 | 0.5% |
| 8 | CHANDRA PRAKASH | IND | 423 | 0.4% |
| 9 | YUSUF JAMAL | IML | 415 | 0.4% |
| 10 | HUKUM SINGH | BD | 413 | 0.4% |
| 11 | JAVED RASHEED | IND | 369 | 0.3% |
| 12 | RAM SAWROOP | IND | 189 | 0.2% |
| 13 | RAM GOPAL SINGH | 142 | 0.1% | |
| 14 | RAMESH SINGH | IND | 123 | 0.1% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
High turnout (68th), a typical margin, a two-to-three-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
5 locationsMordhaj also known as Munawar Jar with lofty mound
Mordhaj also known as Munawar Jar with lofty mound
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.