Back to Uttar Pradesh 1991 map
NITI Aspirational District · 2023-24
Uttar Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 304 · 1991
Etawah
Winner — 1991
ASHOK DUBEY
BJP· BJP
BJP 43.9%JP 27.1%32 others 29.0%
Votes
40,851
43.9% share
Winning margin
15,595
16.8% of votes
Total candidates
34
Turnout
45.2%
of 2,05,848
Etawah is a safe seat — ASHOK DUBEY won by 16.8%.
Seat history
All Candidates
34 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ASHOK DUBEY | BJP | 40,851 | 43.9% |
| 2 | JAIVEER SINGH | JP | 25,256 | 27.1% |
| 3 | LAL SINGH LODHI | 13,055 | 14.0% | |
| 4 | SUDHINDRA BHADAURIA | INC | 8,247 | 8.9% |
| 5 | PRAKASH | IND | 670 | 0.7% |
| 6 | RAKESH TOMAR | Janata Dal | 656 | 0.7% |
| 7 | KARAN SINGH GOYAL | UPRP | 620 | 0.7% |
| 8 | PUJARI LAL | IND | 522 | 0.6% |
| 9 | VIRENDRA SINGH KUSHWAHA | IND | 508 | 0.6% |
| 10 | FATEH JSINGH | IND | 227 | 0.2% |
| 11 | SHAILENDRA SINGH | IND | 211 | 0.2% |
| 12 | PRATAP SINGH | IND | 194 | 0.2% |
| 13 | ASHOK KUMAR S/O NARENDRA SINGH | IND | 165 | 0.2% |
| 14 | MOHAN | IND | 155 | 0.2% |
| 15 | AHIBARAN SINGH | IND | 155 | 0.2% |
| 16 | BABU RAM | IND | 150 | 0.2% |
| 17 | BABA RAM SURAJ SINGH YADAV | IND | 134 | 0.1% |
| 18 | JAGAT SINGH | IND | 129 | 0.1% |
| 19 | RAM SEWAK | IND | 128 | 0.1% |
| 20 | BABU SINGH | 122 | 0.1% | |
| 21 | JITENDRA SINGH | IND | 111 | 0.1% |
| 22 | GIRISH SINGH | IND | 89 | 0.1% |
| 23 | SUSHVENDRA SINGH | IND | 89 | 0.1% |
| 24 | KAKA JOGINDER SINGH ALIAS DHARTI PAKAD | IND | 88 | 0.1% |
| 25 | RAKESH KANAUJIA | IND | 82 | 0.1% |
| 26 | SHIV NATH SINGH | IND | 73 | 0.1% |
| 27 | RAKESH KUMAR | IND | 70 | 0.1% |
| 28 | WAHIDULLAH KHAN ALIAS KALLY BHAI | IND | 60 | 0.1% |
| 29 | CHHOTE | IND | 56 | 0.1% |
| 30 | SUMENDRA SINGH | IND | 54 | 0.1% |
| 31 | ASHOK KUMAR S/O KAYAM SINGH | IND | 49 | 0.1% |
| 32 | RAM PRAKASH GUPTA | IND | 41 | 0.0% |
| 33 | VISHNU | IND | 41 | 0.0% |
| 34 | CHHOTE LAL | IND | 36 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (393rd), a typical margin, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
safe16.8%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 16.9% · min 1.7% · max 61.0%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
49%
lowerhigher
393rd of 403How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.01
fewer partiesmore parties
105th of 403How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.8%
lowerhigher
105th of 403Where does the house stand?
SEAT
419 seats · 210 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.01EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BJP 43.9%JP 27.1%BSP 14.0%INC 8.9%OTH 6.1%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
25,59,297
Density
884 / km²
Sex ratio
976 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
2,895 km²
SC population16.0%
ST population0.5%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
70%HINDU
Hindu 69.9%Muslim 29.2%Other 0.8%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water42.2%
Electricity24.7%
Sanitation12.7%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births69.7%
Children fully vaccinated65.1%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER37.2%
Children underweight (under 5)36.3%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER51.2%
Women literate48.3%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER33.9%
Clean cooking fuel50.6%
Health insurance12.2%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏷️Kalanamak RiceGI
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.