Back to Uttar Pradesh 1991 map
Uttar Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 312 · 1991
Farrukhabad
Winner — 1991
BRAHM DUTT DWIVEDI
BJP· BJP
BJP 32.4%INC 22.0%28 others 45.6%
Votes
26,550
32.4% share
Winning margin
8,485
10.3% of votes
Total candidates
30
Turnout
42.7%
of 1,92,093
A clear win with a 10.3% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
30 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRAHM DUTT DWIVEDI | BJP | 26,550 | 32.4% |
| 2 | VIMAL PRASAD TIWARI | INC | 18,065 | 22.0% |
| 3 | LAL BAHADUR SINGH SHAKYA | JP | 15,493 | 18.9% |
| 4 | RAJ KUMAR SINGH BHADORIYA | Janata Dal | 15,369 | 18.8% |
| 5 | ASHA RAM | 2,290 | 2.8% | |
| 6 | RASHID ALI | 987 | 1.2% | |
| 7 | VIRENDER | IND | 364 | 0.4% |
| 8 | SUBODH KUMAR URF KALI | IND | 283 | 0.3% |
| 9 | MANOJ KUMAR AGARWAL | IND | 249 | 0.3% |
| 10 | LAL BAHADUR SINGH | IND | 242 | 0.3% |
| 11 | SUDHANSH DUTT DWIVEDI | IND | 222 | 0.3% |
| 12 | RAJENDRA PRASAD GUPTA | 208 | 0.3% | |
| 13 | TOTA RAM VERMA | IND | 182 | 0.2% |
| 14 | NIRMAL KUMAR VERMA | IND | 167 | 0.2% |
| 15 | SANTOSH PARJAPATI | MSD | 157 | 0.2% |
| 16 | VIRENDER TIWARI | IND | 137 | 0.2% |
| 17 | RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH | IND | 135 | 0.2% |
| 18 | BALVIR SINGH YADAV | IND | 124 | 0.1% |
| 19 | INDRA PANDEY | IND | 108 | 0.1% |
| 20 | DEVI DAYAL | IND | 107 | 0.1% |
| 21 | ABDUL KHALIK LURF MUNNA HAWALDAR | IND | 81 | 0.1% |
| 22 | RISHI KUMAR | IND | 74 | 0.1% |
| 23 | VIRENDER PAL | IND | 66 | 0.1% |
| 24 | RAKESH KATIYAR | IND | 65 | 0.1% |
| 25 | MANOJ KUMAR | BLMD | 50 | 0.1% |
| 26 | REJENDER SINGH YADAV | IND | 45 | 0.1% |
| 27 | PRADEEP SIGGH CHAUHAN | IND | 44 | 0.1% |
| 28 | PYARE BHAI URF HABIB ALAM KHAN | IND | 39 | 0.1% |
| 29 | GIRISH CHANDER | IND | 31 | 0.0% |
| 30 | HARI CHANDER | IND | 28 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Low turnout (375th), a closer-than-average contest, a fragmented field.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean10.3%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 12.0% · min 1.4% · max 26.6%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
53%
lowerhigher
375th of 403How crowded is the field?
SEAT
3.27
fewer partiesmore parties
39th of 403How much NOTA?
SEAT
0.8%
lowerhigher
103rd of 403Where does the house stand?
SEAT
419 seats · 210 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
3.27EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BJP 32.4%INC 22.0%JP 18.9%JD 18.8%OTH 7.9%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
17,15,183
Density
1042 / km²
Sex ratio
972 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
1,646 km²
SC population21.5%
ST population0.1%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
76%HINDU
Hindu 75.8%Muslim 23.6%Other 0.6%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water35.6%
Electricity30.8%
Sanitation15.0%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births90.6%
Children fully vaccinated80.2%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER42.3%
Children underweight (under 5)34.2%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER43.5%
Women literate61.3%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER16.8%
Clean cooking fuel58.1%
Health insurance20.4%
What's nearby?
1 locationSEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Brass Utensils🏺Hosiery Products
🏛️
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.