Back to Uttar Pradesh 1993 map
Uttar Pradesh · Assembly Constituency 298 · 1993
Chaubepur
Winner — 1993
HARI KISHAN
BJP· BJP
BJP 45.5%SP 43.3%32 others 11.1%
Votes
51,241
45.5% share
Winning margin
2,496
2.2% of votes
Total candidates
34
Turnout
56.7%
of 1,98,580
A closely fought contest. HARI KISHAN won with a 2.2% margin.
Seat history
All Candidates
34 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HARI KISHAN | BJP | 51,241 | 45.5% |
| 2 | KUNWAR SHARAWAN KUMAR SINGH | Samajwadi Party | 48,745 | 43.3% |
| 3 | UMA PRASAD TIWARI | INC | 4,476 | 4.0% |
| 4 | SURESH SINGH YADAV | Janata Dal | 2,884 | 2.6% |
| 5 | RAGHAVENDRA SHARMA | 782 | 0.7% | |
| 6 | RAM BABU PAL | IND | 472 | 0.4% |
| 7 | RAKESH SINGH GAUTAM | IND | 446 | 0.4% |
| 8 | RAJ KUMARI URF CHANDRA KATIYAR | IND | 339 | 0.3% |
| 9 | VIKAS | IND | 315 | 0.3% |
| 10 | CHI. VAIKUNTHA NATH YADAV | IND | 231 | 0.2% |
| 11 | SHIV NARAYAN VERMA | IND | 213 | 0.2% |
| 12 | SATAYA BHAMA URF SUMAN MISHRA | 183 | 0.2% | |
| 13 | GYAN SINGH | IND | 172 | 0.1% |
| 14 | RAGHUVIR | IND | 169 | 0.1% |
| 15 | RAM BABU | IND | 168 | 0.1% |
| 16 | SIDDHA NATH | IND | 157 | 0.1% |
| 17 | RAM AUTAR | IND | 146 | 0.1% |
| 18 | SHANKAR DAYAL PANDEY | IND | 137 | 0.1% |
| 19 | SHAHAJAD ALI | IND | 118 | 0.1% |
| 20 | JAG DEO SINGH YADAV | 111 | 0.1% | |
| 21 | RAMA SHANKAR | IND | 101 | 0.1% |
| 22 | VISHAWA NATH MISHRA | IND | 99 | 0.1% |
| 23 | SURENDRA PAL YADAV | IND | 97 | 0.1% |
| 24 | KUNWAR LALOO SINGH | IND | 96 | 0.1% |
| 25 | RADHEY SHYAM TRIPATHI | IND | 93 | 0.1% |
| 26 | OM SHANKAR | IND | 84 | 0.1% |
| 27 | JAI SHANKAR | IND | 79 | 0.1% |
| 28 | RAJEEV KUMAR SRIVASTAVA | IND | 78 | 0.1% |
| 29 | SURENDRA PATHAK | IND | 70 | 0.1% |
| 30 | RAMESH CHANDRA | IND | 63 | 0.1% |
| 31 | RAVENDRA SINGH | IND | 58 | 0.1% |
| 32 | RAM SARAN KATIYAR | IND | 45 | 0.0% |
| 33 | APARNA CHATURVEDI | IND | 30 | 0.0% |
| 34 | RAYEES AHAMAD | IND | 27 | 0.0% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Affidavit details — declared assets, criminal cases and education — aren't available for this seat yet. The results above are complete; only the candidate-affidavit layer is missing.
Average turnout (262nd), a comfortable margin, an essentially two-way race.
LOADING SEAT HISTORY…
How safe is this seat?
SEAT
lean2.2%
MORE COMPETITIVESAFER
mean 12.9% · min 0.8% · max 41.9%
How contested is turnout?
SEAT
59%
lowerhigher
262nd of 403How crowded is the field?
SEAT
2.21
fewer partiesmore parties
383rd of 403How much NOTA?
SEAT
1.2%
lowerhigher
22nd of 403Where does the house stand?
SEAT
422 seats · 212 majority
How did the vote split?
SEAT
2.21EFFECTIVE PARTIES
BJP 45.5%SP 43.3%OTH 11.1%
Who ran, on record?
SEAT
— NOT YET COMPUTEDA dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Population
34,33,919
Density
858 / km²
Sex ratio
922 ♀/1000 ♂
Area
4,003 km²
SC population15.5%
ST population0.0%
What faith is practised here?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011 C-01
80%HINDU
Hindu 79.8%Muslim 19.8%Other 0.5%
How developed is it?
DISTRICTCENSUS 2011
Tap water35.1%
Electricity19.4%
Sanitation12.5%
How healthy is it?
DISTRICTNFHS-5 · 2019-21
Institutional births81.8%
Children fully vaccinated59.9%
Children stunted (under 5)▼ LOWER IS BETTER45.9%
Children underweight (under 5)28.0%
Women anaemic (15-49)▼ LOWER IS BETTER49.3%
Women literate57.7%
Women married before 18▼ LOWER IS BETTER25.4%
Clean cooking fuel56.2%
Health insurance13.4%
What's nearby?
SEATWIKIDATA · ASI
Known forDISTRICT
🏺Food Processing (Pulses)
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.