Sultanpur
Winner — 2012
A closely fought contest. ANOOP SANDA won with a 3.8% margin.
5 of 16 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹0.11 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
16 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ANOOP SANDA | Samajwadi Party | 57,811 | 31.9% |
| 2 | MOHD. TAHIR KHAN | BSP | 50,999 | 28.1% |
| 3 | CHANDRA BHADRA SINGH | PECP | 32,457 | 17.9% |
| 4 | OM PRAKASH PANDEY | NDA | 21,443 | 11.8% |
| 5 | SANDEEP TIWARI ALIAS PINTU | INC | 10,175 | 5.6% |
| 6 | RUDRA PRATAP | IND | 1,915 | 1.1% |
| 7 | PITAMBER NISHAD | IND | 1,382 | 0.8% |
| 8 | RAMACHAL | IND | 915 | 0.5% |
| 9 | MOHD. HASNAIN | NLP | 698 | 0.4% |
| 10 | MOHAMMAD ATEEQ ANSARI | 628 | 0.3% | |
| 11 | JAVED AKHTER | QED | 571 | 0.3% |
| 12 | KIFAYAT ULLAH | RaIP | 560 | 0.3% |
| 13 | UDAL KUMAR | BRPP | 462 | 0.3% |
| 14 | ASRAR AHAMAD KHAN | 404 | 0.2% | |
| 15 | OM PRAKASH | 363 | 0.2% | |
| 16 | KAMAL SRIVASTAVA | AIMF | 362 | 0.2% |
.png){kind=small}
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Average turnout (295th), a closer-than-average contest, a two-to-three-way race.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹0.11 Cr
A dense, urban district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
1 locationLarge dih called Majhangaon with brick towers on the four corners.
Large dih called Majhangaon with brick towers on the four corners.
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.