Manikpur
Winner — 2022
Manikpur was decided by a razor-thin margin of 0.5% — fewer than 1,048 votes separated winner from runner-up.
5 of 10 declare criminal cases · median assets ₹1.07 Cr — cases registered, not convictions
All Candidates
11 total| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AVINASH CHANDRA DWIVEDI | ADS NDA (NDA) | 73,132 | 35.2% |
| 2 | VEER SINGH PATEL | 72,084 | 34.7% | |
| 3 | BALVEER PAL | BSP | 45,367 | 21.8% |
| 4 | RANJANA BARATI LAL PANDEY | INC | 4,110 | 2.0% |
| — | NOTA | NOTA | 3,325 | 1.6% |
| 6 | SHIVPOOJAN | JANADIP | 2,849 | 1.4% |
| 7 | AVINASH CHANDRA TRIPATHI | 2,054 | 1.0% | |
| 8 | RAMSURAT | ASP | 1,625 | 0.8% |
| 9 | PUSHPENDRA KUMAR TRIPATHI | BKVD | 1,351 | 0.7% |
| 10 | ALI HUSAIN | IND | 1,216 | 0.6% |
| 11 | RAJPRATAP | IND | 817 | 0.4% |
DL — deposit lost: the candidate polled under one-sixth of valid votes and forfeits their election deposit under RPA 1951 s.158.
Average turnout (184th), a closer-than-average contest, a fragmented field.
How safe is this seat?
How contested is turnout?
How crowded is the field?
How much NOTA?
Where does the house stand?
How did the vote split?
Who ran, on record?
declare criminal cases
median assets ₹1.07 Cr
A moderately populated district — less literate than the national rate.
Who lives here?
What faith is practised here?
How developed is it?
How healthy is it?
What's nearby?
12 locationsInscribed statue of Chandel period under a Pipal tree, Mau.
Inscribed statue of Chandel period under a Pipal tree, Mau.
Remains of a magnificent temple, circa 10th century A.D. usually called Bhar Deul,
Remains of a magnificent temple, circa 10th century A.D. usually called Bhar Deul,
Ruins of a large Linga temple of the Chandel type, Mau.
Ruins of a large Linga temple of the Chandel type, Mau.
Landmark data: Wikidata (CC0) · ASI (Government of India, official). Images: Wikimedia Commons (individual CC / public-domain licenses, see each file). Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors.